04 April 2025
Sponsored content: Putting diagnostic stewardship at the heart of antimicrobial stewardship
Written by: Dr Grace Arenas (Medical Scientific Liaison) and Sarah Purnell (Product Manager), bioMérieux. This piece highlights the importance of diagnostic stewardship in optimising antimicrobial therapy against a backdrop of the dynamic nature of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). It also showcases successful initiatives ongoing in the UK & Ireland.
The views, opinions, and recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the Healthcare Infection Society (HIS). Any references to specific products or services are for informational purposes only and are not endorsed by HIS. Always seek further advice from a qualified source before making decisions related to healthcare practices or products.

Diagnostics & Antimicrobial Stewardship

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a global threat, and the UK has made significant progress on AMR policies, underlined by national commitments in the UK Government’s 2024-2029 AMR National Action Plan (NAP).1-3 An evaluation of the first UK AMR national action plan published in 2019, found that “environmental health and diagnostics are areas where there are opportunities for big policy wins to address AMR.” Hence, it is not surprising that the updated AMR Action Plan includes the specific commitment focused on the judicious use of diagnostic tests to provide clinical decision support.3

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is crucial in combating the AMR crisis and antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) provide a framework for responsible antibiotic use, optimising therapy, curbing resistance, and promoting awareness and education.4 ASP’s emerging strategies include diagnostic stewardship, which is vital for effective therapy and limiting AMR development.5

What is Antimicrobial Resistance?

AMR is an ancient and organic subject, as the mechanisms involved are constantly evolving. Consequently, diagnostics need to adapt to continuously support clinical decisions, improve patient outcomes, and prevent development of further resistance.6

 Local AMR picture

The latest European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) AMR surveillance shows that high percentages of resistance to third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems in K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. in several countries is of critical concern.7 The English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) report 2023-24 correlates with the latest ECDC AMR surveillance report. The report found a 3.5% increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteraemia since 2019 with resistant E. coli making up over 65% of the total carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) which have more than doubled between 2021 and 2023. 8

Since the statutory duty to report acquired CPO isolates from human samples began in 2020, NDM has somewhat replaced OXA-48-like as the predominant CPO mechanism detected in England. This slight but steady increase brings treatment concerns; as the reader may relate, NDM-producing organisms are some of the most resistant and challenging organisms to treat. Even more, the overall picture of CPOs in 2023, shows that northern regions and London continued to report higher CPOs incidence, although this is due, in part, to an increase in screening and reporting.8

The increase in Gram-negative resistances to current antibiotic therapy underpins the importance of diagnostics in providing a targeted therapy. Not all organism strains are alike, and tailoring antibiotic therapy based on resistance mechanisms is crucial.

Molecular and phenotypic techniques such as rapid PCR and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) can be used to identify the specific resistance mechanisms present in organism, which can then guide the right antibiotic selection and avoid treatment failure in critical populations.

For more information on carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria and its clinical implications, please visit our educational pages. There are a range of resources and information on the topic of AMS.

Diagnostic Stewardship & AMR

Diagnostic stewardship optimises AMS by ensuring that the right diagnostic tests are used to accurately identify pathogens and their susceptibilities to antibiotics. It ensures that these tests are performed at the right time, especially in clinical conditions like sepsis, when time is of the essence. Results must then be interpreted correctly to guide appropriate clinical decision-making to optimise the antimicrobial therapy.

Many hospitals have introduced rapid molecular and phenotypic testing for these conditions, evaluating its effectiveness in the early administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and exploring the associated challenges.

 

Transforming sepsis management: The Impact of Rapid Diagnostics at Royal Berkshire

Royal Berkshire Hospital faced challenges in pathogen identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing due to the absence of an on-site microbiology lab. To address this, the BioFire® system using the BioFire® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel was introduced on-site, offering a 24/7 service for rapid identification of pathogens and resistance markers in just over an hour from positive blood culture samples. The service was run by the blood science rapid response lab with support from the microbiology network team.

A pilot study was conducted with 183 patient samples. Using the BioFire® system, the time to result was around 4 hours, saving an average of 17 hours per patient. The early results impacted 125 out of 183 patients (63%), leading to more appropriate and efficient antimicrobial treatment. Antibiotics could be stopped and de-escalated where appropriate, achieving better antimicrobial stewardship and saving money. Their analysis showed that one day less of antibiotics resulted in a two-day reduction in the length of stay.

The Trust had also optimised the pre-analytical stage of the blood culture collection and processing pathway to further support the analytic stage.

The introduction of the BioFire® system and improvements to the pathway significantly improved the diagnosis and management of bloodstream infections at the Trust. Enhancing patient care and improving infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. Faster identification of pathogens and their resistance mechanisms facilitated multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) discussions and allowed for:

  • Earlier Targeted Treatment – Reducing the misuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which helps in antimicrobial stewardship and minimises the risk of resistance development.
  • Shorter Hospital Stays – Patients can be diagnosed and treated more efficiently, leading to earlier discharges and reduced exposure to hospital-acquired infections.
  • Improved Infection Control – Rapid identification of resistant organisms helps implement timely isolation and containment measures, preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant infections within healthcare settings.
  • Optimised Patient Outcomes – Faster, accurate diagnoses contribute to better clinical decisions as source of infection can be identified and relevant investigations carried out more quickly.

By integrating advanced diagnostic tools like BIOFIRE® with IPC measures, healthcare institutions can better manage antimicrobial resistance and protect both patients and staff.

UK & Ireland Antimicrobial Stewardship Summits: Advancing practices and innovations

To support AMS discussions and initiatives, bioMérieux hosted two events last year. The first event took place in Athlone, Ireland, featuring talks on AMR and the One Health approach. Ireland's first experience with Global Antimicrobial Stewardship Accreditation Scheme (GAMSAS) accreditation was also on the agenda as well as the impactful role of data and lab experiences in tackling AMR.

St. James's Hospital, Dublin, spoke about the use of an automated streaking system (WASP®) and microbiology middleware (MAESTRIA™) to address lab challenges such as increased workflow, staff shortages, and complex processes. As a bioMérieux Centre of Reference for Data and IT, they plan to build on their achievements, interfacing more systems, implementing CLARION® Lab analytics and improving real-time monitoring and data integration.

AMS Summit Ireland (1)
Figure 1: AMR Summit, Ireland

The second event held in Manchester followed a similar agenda with Gillian Damant, Regional Antimicrobial Stewardship lead - Northwest, speaking about the AMR national action plan and emphasising the importance of a coordinated effort to tackle AMR, focusing on prevention, education, and innovation.

We heard from Edinburgh Royal Infirmary about their clinical study on syndromic molecular testing for pneumonia. Using a combination of PCR assays, they found a significant improvement in pathogen detections (90% vs 40% with standard culture). Results showed that 75% of patients in the molecular arm received appropriate treatment, compared to only 14% in the standard of care group. The BIOFIRE® pneumonia test was effectively assessed for its simplified workflow and rapid turnaround time and is now perceived by clinicians as an effective tool for antimicrobial stewardship.

D646f547 1195 4764 A8c7 F3a6f92b376a
Figure 2: AMR Summit, UK
bioMérieux will be hosting an AMS & Sepsis Summit in May this year. Please click here to view details and register your interest.
References
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). World AMR Awareness Week. Available on https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-amr-awareness-week/2024/amr-is-invisible-i-am-not. Last accessed on January 17, 2025
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). World leaders commit to decisive action on antimicrobial resistance. Available on https://www.who.int/news/item/26-09-2024-world-leaders-commit-to-decisive-action-on-antimicrobial-resistance. Last accessed on January 17, 2025
  3. Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) UK 5-year action plan for antimicrobial resistance 2024 to 2029.  Available on https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-5-year-action-plan-for-antimicrobial-resistance-2024-to-2029. Last accessed on January 17, 2025
  4. Mendelson M, Morris AM, Thursky K, Pulcini C. How to start an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Apr; 26(4):447-453. Doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.007
  5. Ku TSN, Al Mohajer M, Newton JA, et al. Improving antimicrobial use through better diagnosis: The relationship between diagnostic stewardship and antimicrobial stewardship. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2023; 44(12):1901-1908. doi:10.1017/ice.2023.156
  6. Abbas, Amna et al. Antibiotic resistance: A key microbial survival mechanism that threatens public health. Cell Host & Microbe, Volume 32, Issue 6, 837 – 851. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.05.015
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and WHO Regional Office for Europe. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe, 2023 data: executive summary. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2024. 
  8. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2022 to 2023. Available on https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-surveillance-programme-antimicrobial-utilisation-and-resistance-espaur-report. Accessed on January 15, 2025 .